Abstract
This chapter argues that what is to count as corruption, and the apparent lack of success of anti-corruption initiatives, can usefully be understood through detailed examination of how the issues are worked out in specific contexts. It examines in detail how individuals negotiate corruption and anti-corruption through language. The term corruption is often treated as being self-explanatory: the World Bank describes its definition as one that is ‘straightforward’. For many critics, the consistent failure of anti-corruption initiatives results inevitably from how corruption is understood. The corollary is that efforts that are described as anti-corruption are viewed as being intrinsically beneficial, regardless of how they present what they are seeking to address and the measures that are proposed. A particular issue for anti-corruption discourses is that these are nested in settings of international development and governance. A useful starting point is the much-quoted definition provided by the World Bank, still commonly found in discussions of corruption.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Corruption, Social Sciences and the Law |
Subtitle of host publication | Exploration across the disciplines |
Editors | Jane Ellis |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
Chapter | 8 |
Pages | 149-165 |
Number of pages | 17 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780429197352 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780367730086, 9780367186418 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2019 |