Discursive integrity and the principles of responsible public debate

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

This paper articulates a general distinction between two important communicative ideals—expressive sincerity and discursive integrity—and then uses it to analyze problems with political debate in contemporary democracies. In the context of philosophical discussions of different forms of trustworthiness and debates about deliberative democracy, self-knowledge, and moral testimony, the paper develops three arguments for the conclusion that, although expressive sincerity is valuable, we should not ignore discursive integrity in thinking about how to address problems with contemporary political debate. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of a strategy for improving discursive integrity within public political debate by reflecting on which principles of responsible public debate would promote better democratic decision making.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)188-211
JournalJournal of Ethics and Social Philosophy
Issue number2
Early online date26 Jul 2022
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2022

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • integrity
  • sincerity
  • public debate


Dive into the research topics of 'Discursive integrity and the principles of responsible public debate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this