Diversity of behaviour during novel object tests is reduced in pigs housed in substrate-impoverished conditions

F Wemelsfelder*, M Haskell, MT Mendl, S Calvert, AB Lawrence

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

Modern intensive farming conditions lack the diversity of substrates present in more natural environments and offer young animals fewer opportunities for interaction. Evidence exists that this may affect the organization of interactive patterns of behaviour, but shifts in behavioural diversity have not been measured directly. We investigated the effect of the substrate in the home pen on the diversity of behaviour in young growing pigs, Sos scrofa. Over 5 months, 26 pigs were housed singly in either substrate-impoverished (SI) or substrate-enriched (SE) conditions. Once every month we recorded the behaviour of these pigs in detail both in the home pens and in two novel object tests. In addition, we calculated the diversity of behaviour shown by SI and SE pigs in the home pen and in the novel object tests, using a relative behavioural diversity index. In the two novel object tests, SI pigs were less mobile than SE pigs and focused their behaviour on particular substrates. In addition, SI pigs showed less diverse behaviour than SE pigs. Our results show that the less diverse behaviour of SI pigs previously recorded in their home pens persists under novel conditions, supporting the hypothesis that substrate-impoverished housing conditions structurally affect the organization of behaviour in young growing pigs. (C) 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)385-394
Number of pages10
JournalAnimal Behaviour
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2000

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)



Dive into the research topics of 'Diversity of behaviour during novel object tests is reduced in pigs housed in substrate-impoverished conditions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this