Do you know what I know? The impact of participant role in children's referential communication

Holly Branigan, Jenny Bell, Janet McLean

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

For successful language use, interlocutors must be able to accurately assess their shared knowledge (“common ground”). Such knowledge can be accumulated through linguistic and non-linguistic context, but the same context can be associated with different patterns of knowledge, depending on the interlocutor’s participant role (Wilkes-Gibbs & Clark, 1992). Although there is substantial evidence that children’s ability to model partners’ knowledge develops gradually, most such evidence focuses on non-linguistic context. We investigated the extent to which 8-to 10-year-old children can assess common ground developed through prior linguistic context, and whether this is sensitive to variations in participant role. Children repeatedly described tangram figures to another child, and then described the same figures to a third child who had been a side-participant, an overhearer, or absent during the initial conversation. Children showed evidence of partner modelling, producing shorter referential expressions with repeated mention to the same partner. Moreover, they demonstrated sensitivity to differences in common ground with the third child based on participant role on some but not all measures (e.g., description length, but not definiteness). Our results suggest that by ten, children make distinctions about common ground accumulated through prior linguistic context but do not yet consistently deploy this knowledge in an adult-like way.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-15
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Publication statusPublished - 24 Feb 2016

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • children
  • participant role
  • referential communication
  • common ground
  • dialogue


Dive into the research topics of 'Do you know what I know? The impact of participant role in children's referential communication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this