Does a dendritic democracy need a ruler?

David C. Sterratt, Arjen Van Ooyen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In hippocampal CA1 cells, distance-dependent synaptic scaling (Nat. Neurosci. 3 (2000) 895, J. Neurosci. 21 (2001) 9151) helps maintain a “dendritic democracy” (Curr. Biol. 11 (2001) R10) where distal and proximal synapses on average contribute equally to the cell's firing. A “dendritic ruler”, for example a concentration gradient, might be necessary for synaptic scaling. Alternatively, synapses could “self-regulate” by gauging their distance from the soma using properties of backpropagating spikes. We show in a model CA1 cell (Neuron 37 (2003) 977) that the delay between a synchronous burst of simulated Schaffer collateral input and the arrival of backpropagating spikes at synapses predict the synapse's location and amplitude at the soma well, though the amplitude of the spikes do not. This suggests that a dendritic ruler is not required to scale synapses.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)437-442
Number of pages6
JournalNeurocomputing
Volume58-60
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2004

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does a dendritic democracy need a ruler?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this