“Don’t let the trial kill the intervention”: How can researchers and care home teams implement complex intervention trials in care homes?

Susan Deborah Shenkin, Adam Lee Gordon, Lucy Johnston, Cheryl Henderson, W P Achterberg

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

The profile of care homes has never been higher, and not necessarily for the best reasons[1]. The COVID-19 pandemic has had, and continues to have, a massive impact on care home residents[2] , their families, the staff and organisations who care for them, and surrounding local communities[3] . It has also highlighted the lack of good evidence based treatments tailored for this population, and the challenges of rapidly setting up and delivering trials to provide high quality evidence based care for COVID-19 (e.g. the PROTECT-CH trial www.protect-trial.net). The lessons learned from developing care home trials during COVID-19 are also relevant to other trials for conditions that are common in care home residents, such as delirium, dementia, falls, incontinence and pressure damage. Previous trials have often delivered inconclusive results, which is a waste of public funds, particularly as the infrastructure supporting these trials is developed for the specific study and dismantled once it is complete. This has led to the question of whether null results are due to avoidable aspects of trial design, leading to asking: ‘did the trial kill the intervention?’[4]
Original languageEnglish
Article numberafac068
JournalAge and Ageing
Volume51
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Mar 2022

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Homes for the Aged
  • Humans
  • Research Design
  • Research Personnel

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“Don’t let the trial kill the intervention”: How can researchers and care home teams implement complex intervention trials in care homes?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this