Don't mind meat? The denial of mind to animals used for human consumption

Brock Bastian*, Steve Loughnan, Nick Haslam, Helena R. M. Radke

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Many people like eating meat, but most are reluctant to harm things that have minds. The current three studies show that this dissonance motivates people to deny minds to animals. Study 1 demonstrates that animals considered appropriate for human consumption are ascribed diminished mental capacities. Study 2 shows that meat eaters are motivated to deny minds to food animals when they are reminded of the link between meat and animal suffering. Finally, Study 3 provides direct support for our dissonance hypothesis, showing that expectations regarding the immediate consumption of meat increase mind denial. Moreover, this mind denial in turn reduces negative affect associated with dissonance. The findings highlight the role of dissonance reduction in facilitating the practice of meat eating and protecting cultural commitments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)247-256
Number of pages10
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume38
Issue number2
Early online date6 Oct 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2012

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • mind attribution
  • dementalization
  • morality
  • meat
  • animals

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Don't mind meat? The denial of mind to animals used for human consumption'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this