Doomsday, Bishop Ussher and simulated worlds

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


This paper attempts three tasks in relation to Carter and Leslie's Doomsday Argument. First, it criticises Timothy Chambers' ‘Ussherian Corollary’, a striking but unsuccessful objection to standard Doomsday arguments. Second, it reformulates the Ussherian Corollary as an objection to Bradley Monton's variant Doomsday and Nick Bostrom's Simulation Argument. Finally, it tries to diagnose the epistemic/metaphysical problems facing Doomsday-related arguments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)201-217
Number of pages17
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2008


Dive into the research topics of 'Doomsday, Bishop Ussher and simulated worlds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this