Elgin on understanding: How does it involve know-how, endorsement and factivity?

Emma C. Gordon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In Chapter 3 of True Enough, Elgin (2017) outlines her view of objectual understanding, focusing largely on its non-factive nature and the extent to which a certain kind of know-how is required for the “grasping” component of understanding. I will explore four central issues that feature in this chapter, concentrating on (1) the role of know-how, (2) the concept of endorsement, (3) Elgin’s critique of the factivity constraint on understanding, and (4) how we might use aspects of Elgin’s framework to inform related debates on the norm of assertion.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages18
JournalSynthese
Early online date18 Sept 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 18 Sept 2019

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • Elgin
  • knowledge
  • understanding
  • know-how
  • assertion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Elgin on understanding: How does it involve know-how, endorsement and factivity?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this