Dyson and Samsung Compared: Functionality and Aesthetics in the Design Infringement Analysis

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	273-86
Journal	European Intellectual Property Review
Volume	35
Issue number	5
Publication status	Published - 2013

Access to Document

Dyson and Samsung Compared
This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article whose final and definitive form, the Version of Record, has been published in the European Intellectual Property Review (2013), 35,5, p.273-286. © Sweet & Maxwell. Cornwell, J. (2013). Dyson and Samsung Compared: Functionality and Aesthetics in the Design Infringement Analysis. European Intellectual Property Review, 35(5), 273-86.
Accepted author manuscript, 496 KB

@article{a068500c4fc94d9eac38581192a2e584,

title = "Dyson and Samsung Compared: Functionality and Aesthetics in the Design Infringement Analysis",

author = "Jane Cornwell",

note = "xDOI - kgb requested from ILLiad - 7 May 2013 (kgb)",

year = "2013",

language = "English",

volume = "35",

pages = "273--86",

journal = "European Intellectual Property Review",

issn = "0142-0461",

publisher = "Sweet & Maxwell",

number = "5",

}