Enabling Monolingual Translators: Post-Editing vs. Options

Philipp Koehn

Enabling Monolingual Translators: Post-Editing vs. Options

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

We carried out a study on monolingual translators with no knowledge of the source language, but aided by post-editing and the display of translation options. On Arabic-English and Chinese-English, using standard test data and current statistical machine translation systems, 10 monolingual translators were able to translate 35% of Arabic and 28% of Chinese sentences correctly on average, with some of
the participants coming close to professional bilingual performance on some of the documents.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Human Language Technologies: Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Proceedings, June 2-4, 2010, Los Angeles, California, USA
Pages	537-545
Number of pages	9
Publication status	Published - 2010

Access to Document

http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N10-1078

Cite this

@inproceedings{7ed22804102c4f1eacf573c313497a5d,

title = "Enabling Monolingual Translators: Post-Editing vs. Options",

abstract = "We carried out a study on monolingual translators with no knowledge of the source language, but aided by post-editing and the display of translation options. On Arabic-English and Chinese-English, using standard test data and current statistical machine translation systems, 10 monolingual translators were able to translate 35% of Arabic and 28% of Chinese sentences correctly on average, with some ofthe participants coming close to professional bilingual performance on some of the documents.",

author = "Philipp Koehn",

year = "2010",

language = "English",

pages = "537--545",

booktitle = "Human Language Technologies: Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Proceedings, June 2-4, 2010, Los Angeles, California, USA",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Enabling Monolingual Translators: Post-Editing vs. Options

AU - Koehn, Philipp

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - We carried out a study on monolingual translators with no knowledge of the source language, but aided by post-editing and the display of translation options. On Arabic-English and Chinese-English, using standard test data and current statistical machine translation systems, 10 monolingual translators were able to translate 35% of Arabic and 28% of Chinese sentences correctly on average, with some ofthe participants coming close to professional bilingual performance on some of the documents.

AB - We carried out a study on monolingual translators with no knowledge of the source language, but aided by post-editing and the display of translation options. On Arabic-English and Chinese-English, using standard test data and current statistical machine translation systems, 10 monolingual translators were able to translate 35% of Arabic and 28% of Chinese sentences correctly on average, with some ofthe participants coming close to professional bilingual performance on some of the documents.

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 537

EP - 545

BT - Human Language Technologies: Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Proceedings, June 2-4, 2010, Los Angeles, California, USA

ER -

Enabling Monolingual Translators: Post-Editing vs. Options

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this