Abstract
Due to a typographical error, the original version of the above article read 'Cochrane crowd are a substitute for a systematic review by a team with appropriate expertise'. This has now been corrected online to read 'Cochrane crowd are not a substitute for a systematic review by a team with appropriate expertise'. The authors apologize for this error.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | E15 |
| Journal | Age and Ageing |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2021 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: Systematic reviews: Guidance relevant for studies of older people (Age and Ageing (2017) 46:5 (722–728) DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afx105)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver