Errors in ‘The History of an Error’

Aaron Meskin, Simon Fokt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In a recent article in this journal, Alex Neill and Aaron Ridley argue that relational theories of art are rooted in a misunderstanding of what it would take to falsify the family resemblance theories they are meant to supplant, and are incapable of meeting all the requirements a successful theory of art must meet. Hence, they are doomed to failure. We show that the arguments Neill and Ridley offer are rooted in misunderstandings about relational theories and the requirements for a successful theory of art. If relational theories must fail, it will not be for the reasons identified by Neill and Ridley.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-185
JournalBritish journal of aesthetics
Volume56
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2016

Keywords

  • aesthetics
  • definition of art
  • institutional definition of art
  • art

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Errors in ‘The History of an Error’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this