Abstract
By investigating ESG-based remuneration in the UK FTSE 350 companies, this article finds that in practice, ESG-based remuneration may depart from its expected role in promoting corporate sustainability, whereas being adopted as a tactic for impression management or managerial rent extraction. Due to the unmeasurable effects of most ESG factors on shareholder value and their subjective nature, ESG-based remuneration is vulnerable to exploitation for symbolic and self-serving purposes. For companies aiming to promote long-term shareholder value, extending the assessment period of financial performance is a less costly and risky option compared to ESG-based remuneration. Differently, for companies oriented by a stakeholder purpose, ESG-based remuneration may play a part in incentivising executives to achieve plural stakeholder interests. To mitigate the risk of exploitation, this article proposes rule tightening in the current disclosure and monitoring frameworks for executive remuneration.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-43 |
Journal | Journal of Corporate Law Studies |
Early online date | 15 Sept 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 15 Sept 2023 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- corporate sustainability
- enlightened shareholder value
- ESG-based remuneration
- incentives
- stakeholder interests