Abstract
By investigating ESG-based remuneration in the UK FTSE 350 companies, this article finds that in practice, ESG-based remuneration may depart from its expected role in promoting corporate sustainability, whereas being adopted as a tactic for impression management or managerial rent extraction. Due to the unmeasurable effects of most ESG factors on shareholder value and their subjective nature, ESG-based remuneration is vulnerable to exploitation for symbolic and self-serving purposes. For companies aiming to promote long-term shareholder value, extending the assessment period of financial performance is a less costly and risky option compared to ESG-based remuneration. Differently, for companies oriented by a stakeholder purpose, ESG-based remuneration may play a part in incentivising executives to achieve plural stakeholder interests. To mitigate the risk of exploitation, this article proposes rule tightening in the current disclosure and monitoring frameworks for executive remuneration.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-43 |
| Journal | Journal of Corporate Law Studies |
| Early online date | 15 Sept 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 15 Sept 2023 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- corporate sustainability
- enlightened shareholder value
- ESG-based remuneration
- incentives
- stakeholder interests