TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of the potential killing performance of novel percussive and cervical dislocation tools in chicken cadavers
AU - Martin, Jessica
AU - McKeegan, Dorothy E. F.
AU - Sparrey, Julian
AU - Sandilands, Victoria
PY - 2017/1/13
Y1 - 2017/1/13
N2 - 1.Four mechanical poultry killing devices; modified Armadillo® (MARM), modified Rabbit ZingerTM (MZIN), modified pliers (MPLI) and a novel mechanical cervical dislocation gloved device (NMCD), were assessed for their killing potential in chicken the cadavers of euthanised, of four bird type and age combinations: layer/adult, layer/pullet, broiler/slaughter-age, broiler/chick.2.A 4x4x4 factorial design (batch x device x bird type + age) was employed. Ten bird cadavers per bird type and age were tested with each of the four mechanical devices (N = 160 birds). All cadavers were examined post-mortem to establish the anatomical damage caused by each device.3.Three of the mechanical methods: NMCD, MARM and MZIN demonstrated killing potential, as well as consistency in their anatomical effects, with device success rates of over 50% indicating that the devices performed optimally more than half of the time. NMCD had the highest killing potential, with 100% of birds sustaining the required physical trauma to have caused rapid death.4.The MPLI was inconsistent, and only performed optimally for 27.5% of birds, despite good killing potential when performing well. Severe crushing injury was seen in >50% of MPLI birds, suggesting that birds would die of asphyxia rather than cerebral ischemia, a major welfare concern. As a result the modified pliers are not recommended as a humane on-farm killing device for chickens.5.This experiment provides important data on the killing potential of untried novel percussive and mechanical cervical dislocation methods, informing future studies.
AB - 1.Four mechanical poultry killing devices; modified Armadillo® (MARM), modified Rabbit ZingerTM (MZIN), modified pliers (MPLI) and a novel mechanical cervical dislocation gloved device (NMCD), were assessed for their killing potential in chicken the cadavers of euthanised, of four bird type and age combinations: layer/adult, layer/pullet, broiler/slaughter-age, broiler/chick.2.A 4x4x4 factorial design (batch x device x bird type + age) was employed. Ten bird cadavers per bird type and age were tested with each of the four mechanical devices (N = 160 birds). All cadavers were examined post-mortem to establish the anatomical damage caused by each device.3.Three of the mechanical methods: NMCD, MARM and MZIN demonstrated killing potential, as well as consistency in their anatomical effects, with device success rates of over 50% indicating that the devices performed optimally more than half of the time. NMCD had the highest killing potential, with 100% of birds sustaining the required physical trauma to have caused rapid death.4.The MPLI was inconsistent, and only performed optimally for 27.5% of birds, despite good killing potential when performing well. Severe crushing injury was seen in >50% of MPLI birds, suggesting that birds would die of asphyxia rather than cerebral ischemia, a major welfare concern. As a result the modified pliers are not recommended as a humane on-farm killing device for chickens.5.This experiment provides important data on the killing potential of untried novel percussive and mechanical cervical dislocation methods, informing future studies.
KW - Killing
KW - poultry
KW - cervical dislocation
KW - percussive
KW - post-mortem
KW - animal welfare
U2 - 10.1080/00071668.2017.1280724
DO - 10.1080/00071668.2017.1280724
M3 - Article
SN - 0007-1668
VL - 58
SP - 216
EP - 223
JO - British Poultry Science
JF - British Poultry Science
IS - 3
ER -