Evidence of a decline in transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance in the United Kingdom

Sheila Burns, Sheila Cameron, Patricia Cane, Porton Down, Ian Chrystie, Duncan Churchill, Valerie Delpech, Deenan Pillay, David Dunn, Esther Fearnhill, Hannah Green, Kholoud Porter, Philippa Easterbrook, Mark Zuckerman, Anna Maria Geretti, Rob Gifford, Paul Kellam, Andrew Phillips, Caroline Sabin, David GoldbergMark Gompels, Antony Hale, Steve Kaye, Andrew Leigh Brown, Chloe Orkin, Anton Pozniak, Gerry Robb, Erasmus Smit, Peter Tilston, Ian Williams, Jonathan Ainsworth, Jane Anderson, Abdel Babiker, Martin Fisher, Brian Gazzard, Richard Gilson, Teresa Hill, Margaret Johnson, Clifford Leen, Tariq Sadiq, Achim Schwenk, John Walsh, Ray Brettle, Janet Darbyshire, Sarah Fidler, David Hawkins, Harold Jaffe, Anne Johnson, Ken McLean, UK Collaborative Grp HIV Drug Resistance, UK CHIC Steering Comm, UK Register HIV Seroconverters Ste

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

Objective: To examine recent trends in transmitted drug resistance (TDR) in the United Kingdom. Methods: Analysis of results of genotypic resistance tests reported to the UK HIV Drug Resistance Database, which includes virtually all tests conducted as part of routine clinical care nationally. Resistance was based on major mutations as defined in the 2005 International AIDS Society-USA guidelines. Analysis was restricted to persons who were antiretroviral treatment-naive at the time of sampling, and a test defined as relating to recent infection if the patient was co-enrolled in the UK Register of HIV Seroconverters and the sample taken within 18 months of a negative HIV antibody test. Results: A total of 4454 samples from treatment-naive patients between 1996 and 2004 were analysed, including 316 from patients recently infected at the time of the resistance test. After an initial rise, TDR declined from a peak of around 14% in 2001-2002 to around 8% by the end of 2004 (P-trend <0.001), largely driven by a decrease in nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mutations. Non-NRTI resistance has become increasingly important in relative terms and is now as common as NRTI resistance. Among patients with recent infection, an almost identical pattern was observed but shifted approximately 2 years earlier. A change in the distribution of viral subtypes did not explain these temporal trends. Conclusions: This is the first clear evidence of a decrease in TDR at national level. The wider use of regimens that suppress viral concentration to below infectious levels is one of several plausible explanations for this finding. (C) 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)1035-1039
Number of pages5
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Cite this