Explaining institutional strength: The case of national human rights institutions in Europe and its Neighbourhood

Corina Lacatus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

National human rights institutions have spread rapidly across Europe and its Neighbourhood consolidating their powers to protect human rights. Yet, we know little about the causes for change in the strength of national human rights institutions over time. We propose an analysis of institutional strength along two dimensions of safeguards – durability and enforcement – based on original data for 50 states. We illustrate the quantitative analysis with two case studies – Hungary and Poland. We find that European Union membership conditionality is the strongest predictor of increased strength in national human rights institutions. Additionally, we find evidence of democratic ‘lock-in’, as newly democratised states seek to increase the durability of their institutions. The influence of the United Nations and the European Union, through state networks, increases the strength of national human rights institutions, particularly their durability. The Council of Europe has a positive impact on the institutional safeguards for enforcement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1657-1677
JournalJournal of European Public Policy
Volume26
Issue number11
Early online date15 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Nov 2019

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • institutional strength
  • Europe
  • European Neighbourhood Policy
  • Hungary
  • national human rights institutions
  • Poland

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Explaining institutional strength: The case of national human rights institutions in Europe and its Neighbourhood'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this