Abstract
Objective Hospital electronic prescribing (ePrescribing) systems offer a wide range of patient safety benefits. Like other hospital health information technology (HIT) interventions, however, they may also introduce new areas of risk. Despite recent advances in identifying these risks, the development and use of ePrescribing system is still leading to numerous unintended consequences, which may undermine improvement and threaten patient safety. These negative consequences need to be traced into the design, implementation and use of these systems. We therefore aimed to understand the roots of these reported threats and identify candidate avoidance/mitigation strategies.
Methods We analysed a longitudinal, qualitative study of the implementation and adoption of ePrescribing systems in six English hospitals, each being conceptualised as a case study. Data included semi-structured interviews, observations of implementation meetings and system use, and a collection of relevant documents. We analysed data first within and then across case studies.
Results Our dataset included 214 interviews, 24 observations, and 18 documents. We developed a taxonomy of factors underlying unintended safety threats in: 1) sub-optimal design of systems, including lack of support for complex medication administration regimes, lack of effective integration between different systems, and lack of effective automated decision support tools; 2) inappropriate use of systems – in particular due to too much reliance on the system and introduction of workarounds; and 3) sub-optimal implementation strategies resulting from partial roll-outs/dual systems and lack of appropriate training. We have identified a number of system and organisational strategies that could potentially avoid or reduce these risks.
Conclusions Difficulties in the design, implementation and use of ePrescribing systems can give rise to unintended consequences, including safety threats. Hospitals and suppliers need to implement short- and long-term strategies in terms of the technology and organisation to minimise the unintended safety risks.
Methods We analysed a longitudinal, qualitative study of the implementation and adoption of ePrescribing systems in six English hospitals, each being conceptualised as a case study. Data included semi-structured interviews, observations of implementation meetings and system use, and a collection of relevant documents. We analysed data first within and then across case studies.
Results Our dataset included 214 interviews, 24 observations, and 18 documents. We developed a taxonomy of factors underlying unintended safety threats in: 1) sub-optimal design of systems, including lack of support for complex medication administration regimes, lack of effective integration between different systems, and lack of effective automated decision support tools; 2) inappropriate use of systems – in particular due to too much reliance on the system and introduction of workarounds; and 3) sub-optimal implementation strategies resulting from partial roll-outs/dual systems and lack of appropriate training. We have identified a number of system and organisational strategies that could potentially avoid or reduce these risks.
Conclusions Difficulties in the design, implementation and use of ePrescribing systems can give rise to unintended consequences, including safety threats. Hospitals and suppliers need to implement short- and long-term strategies in terms of the technology and organisation to minimise the unintended safety risks.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | bmjqs-2016-005879.R2 |
Pages (from-to) | 722-733 |
Journal | BMJ Quality & Safety |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 9 |
Early online date | 7 Feb 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Keywords
- computerised physician order entry and clinical decision support
- ePrescribing
- health information technology
- safety risks
- unintended consequences