External data required timely response by the Trial Steering-Data Monitoring Committee for the NALoxone InVEstigation (N-ALIVE) pilot trial

Sheila M Bird, John Strang, Deborah Ashby, John Podmore, J Roy Robertson, Sarah Welch, Angela M Meade, Mahesh K B Parmar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The prison-based N-ALIVE pilot trial had undertaken to notify the Research Ethics Committee and participants if we had reason to believe that the N-ALIVE pilot trial would not proceed to the main trial. In this paper, we describe how external data for the third year of before/after evaluation from Scotland's National Naloxone Programme, a related public health policy, were anticipated by eliciting prior opinion about the Scottish results in the month prior to their release as official statistics. We summarise how deliberations by the N-ALIVE Trial Steering-Data Monitoring Committee (TS-DMC) on N-ALIVE's own interim data, together with those on naloxone-on-release (NOR) from Scotland, led to the decision to cease randomization in the N-ALIVE pilot trial and recommend to local Principal Investigators that NOR be offered to already-randomized prisoners who had not yet been released.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)100-106
Number of pages7
JournalContemporary clinical trials communications
Volume5
Early online date18 Jan 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2017

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'External data required timely response by the Trial Steering-Data Monitoring Committee for the NALoxone InVEstigation (N-ALIVE) pilot trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this