Projects per year
Abstract
Objective: The QCovid 2 and 3 algorithms are risk prediction tools developed during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic that can be used to predict risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation and mortality, taking vaccination status into account. In this paper we assess their performance in Scotland.
Methods: We used the EAVE II national COVID-19 data platform consisting of individual-level data for the population of Scotland (5.4 million residents). Primary care data were linked to reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) virology testing, hospitalisation and mortality data. We assessed the discrimination and calibration of the QCovid 2 and 3 algorithms in predicting COVID-19 hospitalisations and deaths between 8 December 2020 and 15 June 2021.
Results: Our validation dataset comprised 465,058 individuals, aged 19-100. We found the following performance metrics (95% confidence intervals) for QCovid 2 and 3: Harrell’s C 0.84 (0.82, 0.86) for hospitalisation, and 0.92 (0.90, 0.94) for death, observed-expected ratio of 0.24 for hospitalisation and 0.26 for death (i.e. both the number of hospitalisations and the number of deaths were overestimated), and a Brier score of 0.0009 (0.00084, 0.00096) for hospitalisation and 0.00036 (0.00032, 0.0004) for death.
Conclusions: We found good discrimination of the QCovid 2 and 3 algorithms in Scotland, although performance was worse in higher age groups. Both the number of hospitalisations and the number of deaths were overestimated.
Methods: We used the EAVE II national COVID-19 data platform consisting of individual-level data for the population of Scotland (5.4 million residents). Primary care data were linked to reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) virology testing, hospitalisation and mortality data. We assessed the discrimination and calibration of the QCovid 2 and 3 algorithms in predicting COVID-19 hospitalisations and deaths between 8 December 2020 and 15 June 2021.
Results: Our validation dataset comprised 465,058 individuals, aged 19-100. We found the following performance metrics (95% confidence intervals) for QCovid 2 and 3: Harrell’s C 0.84 (0.82, 0.86) for hospitalisation, and 0.92 (0.90, 0.94) for death, observed-expected ratio of 0.24 for hospitalisation and 0.26 for death (i.e. both the number of hospitalisations and the number of deaths were overestimated), and a Brier score of 0.0009 (0.00084, 0.00096) for hospitalisation and 0.00036 (0.00032, 0.0004) for death.
Conclusions: We found good discrimination of the QCovid 2 and 3 algorithms in Scotland, although performance was worse in higher age groups. Both the number of hospitalisations and the number of deaths were overestimated.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e075958 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-8 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | BMJ Open |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 12 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 27 Dec 2023 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'External validation of the QCovid 2 and 3 risk prediction algorithms for risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation and mortality in adults: a national cohort study in Scotland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 2 Finished
-
COVID-19: Early Assessment of COVID-19 epidemiology and Vaccine/anti-viral Effectiveness (EAVE II)
Simpson, C. (Principal Investigator) & Sheikh, A. (Co-investigator)
1/04/20 → 30/09/21
Project: Research
-
BREATHE - The Health Data Research Hub for Respiratory Health
Sheikh, A. (Principal Investigator)
1/10/19 → 31/03/23
Project: Research