Abstract
Several approaches to automatic speech summarization are discussed below, using the ICSI Meetings corpus. We contrast feature-based approaches using prosodic and lexical features with maximal marginal relevance and latent semantic analysis approaches to summarization. While the latter two techniques are borrowed directly from the field of text summarization, featurebased approaches using prosodic information are able to utilize characteristics unique to speech data. We also investigate how the summarization results might deteriorate when carried out on ASR output as opposed to manual transcripts. All of the summaries are of an extractive variety, and are compared using the software ROUGE.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | 9th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Interspeech 2005 - Eurospeech) |
| Pages | 593-596 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 |
| Event | 9th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Interspeech 2005 - Eurospeech) - Lisbon, Portugal Duration: 4 Sept 2005 → 8 Sept 2005 |
Conference
| Conference | 9th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Interspeech 2005 - Eurospeech) |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Portugal |
| City | Lisbon |
| Period | 4/09/05 → 8/09/05 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Extractive Summarization of Meeting Recordings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver