Abstract
Even under perfect fixation the human eye is under steady motion (tremor, microsaccades, slow drift). The “dynamic” theory of vision [1, 2] states that eye-movements can improve hyperacuity. According to this theory, eye movements are thought to create variable spatial excitation patterns on the photoreceptor grid, which will allow for better spatiotemporal summation at later stages. We reexamine this theory using a realistic model of the vertebrate retina by comparing responses of a resting and a moving eye. The performance of simulated ganglion cells in a hyperacuity task is evaluated by ideal observer analysis. We find that in the central retina eye-micromovements have no effect on the performance. Here optical blurring limits vernier acuity. In the retinal periphery however, eye-micromovements clearly improve performance. Based on ROC analysis, our predictions are quantitatively testable in electrophysiological and psychophysical experiments.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 16 (NIPS 2003) |
Editors | S. Thrun, L.K. Saul, B. Schölkopf |
Publisher | MIT Press |
Pages | 1475-1482 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Publication status | Published - 2004 |