TY - JOUR
T1 - Factors which nurture geographical resilience in Britain
T2 - a mixed methods study
AU - Mitchell, R
AU - Gibbs, J
AU - Tunstall, H
AU - Platt, S
AU - Dorling, D
PY - 2009/1
Y1 - 2009/1
N2 - Objectives: To identify plausible mechanisms by whichresilience (low mortality rates despite persistent economicadversity) was achieved in some areas in Britainbetween 1971 and 2001.Methods: Mixed method observational study, combiningquantitative analyses of cause- and age group-specificmortality rates, and area sociodemographic and environmentalcharacteristics, with case studies of resilient areaswhich included in-depth interviews.Results: The causes of death, and age groups,contributing most to resilience varied markedly betweenthe 18 resilient areas; as disease aetiology varies, a rangeof protective processes must be in operation. Four areacharacteristics, which plausibly contributed to resilience,emerged from the in-depth interviews: populationcomposition; retaining or attracting population; environmentand housing; and social cohesion. Quantitativeanalyses demonstrated significant difference betweenresilient and non-resilient areas in retaining or attractingpopulation only. Conclusions: While we identified plausible area characteristics through which resilience was achieved, theredoes not appear to be a definitive set that reliablyproduces resilience, and resilient and non-resilient areasdid not differ significantly in their possession of most ofthese characteristics. If such characteristics do have arole in creating resilience, but are present in both resilient and non-resilient areas, further work is needed to explore what makes them ''successful'' in some areas, but not in others.
AB - Objectives: To identify plausible mechanisms by whichresilience (low mortality rates despite persistent economicadversity) was achieved in some areas in Britainbetween 1971 and 2001.Methods: Mixed method observational study, combiningquantitative analyses of cause- and age group-specificmortality rates, and area sociodemographic and environmentalcharacteristics, with case studies of resilient areaswhich included in-depth interviews.Results: The causes of death, and age groups,contributing most to resilience varied markedly betweenthe 18 resilient areas; as disease aetiology varies, a rangeof protective processes must be in operation. Four areacharacteristics, which plausibly contributed to resilience,emerged from the in-depth interviews: populationcomposition; retaining or attracting population; environmentand housing; and social cohesion. Quantitativeanalyses demonstrated significant difference betweenresilient and non-resilient areas in retaining or attractingpopulation only. Conclusions: While we identified plausible area characteristics through which resilience was achieved, theredoes not appear to be a definitive set that reliablyproduces resilience, and resilient and non-resilient areasdid not differ significantly in their possession of most ofthese characteristics. If such characteristics do have arole in creating resilience, but are present in both resilient and non-resilient areas, further work is needed to explore what makes them ''successful'' in some areas, but not in others.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58249105151&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/jech.2007.072058
DO - 10.1136/jech.2007.072058
M3 - Article
VL - 63
SP - 18
EP - 23
JO - Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health
JF - Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health
SN - 0143-005X
IS - 1
ER -