Abstract
Philosophical discussions of pornography are often located within the philosophy of language, due to Rae Langton and Jennifer Hornsby’s pioneering speech-act theoretic treatments, offered with an eye towards issues concerning freedom of speech. An alternative (though not inconsistent) approach sees pornography as a topic for epistemologists; in particular, a number of philosophers have recently suggested a crucial part of what makes pornography troubling is that it acts as a kind of propaganda. However, while mainstream pornography tends to peddle a harmful, sexism sexual ideology, some feminists, including some feminist philosophers, have expressed the hope that feminist pornography could harness pornography’s persuasive force-its propagandic power to shape the attitudes, and perhaps the behaviour, of its consumers-but change the message. In this chapter, McGlynn critically examines this proposal and draws the disappointing conclusion that it is likely to fail, given the way that propaganda works.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Applied Epistemology |
Editors | Jennifer Lackey |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Chapter | 12 |
Pages | 283-301 |
Number of pages | 19 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780191872082 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780198833659 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 6 May 2021 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- feminist pornography
- ideology
- mainstream pornography
- propaganda
- sexism