Abstract
We apply duration analysis to model the tenure and mode of exit of CEOs from FTSE 350 companies from 1996–2005, a decade in which corporate governance reforms have sought to increase the accountability of the CEO to shareholders and their representatives on the board. We find a greater likelihood of dismissal in the latter part of the period. However, we also find that the likelihood of forced departure sharply decreases from the fifth year of a CEO's tenure. We find evidence that this is because CEOs who survive beyond year four are able to entrench themselves in their position.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 463-481 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | The Economic Journal |
| Volume | 119 |
| Issue number | 536 |
| Early online date | 18 Feb 2009 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2009 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Fired or Retired? A Competing Risk analysis of CEO Turnover'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver