Formalising Σ -Protocols and Commitment Schemes Using CryptHOL

D. Butler*, A. Lochbihler, D. Aspinall, A. Gascón

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Machine-checked proofs of security are important to increase the rigour of provable security. In this work we present a formalised theory of two fundamental two party cryptographic primitives: Σ-protocols and Commitment Schemes. Σ-protocols allow a prover to convince a verifier that they possess some knowledge without leaking information about the knowledge. Commitment schemes allow a committer to commit to a message and keep it secret until revealing it at a later time. We use CryptHOL (Lochbihler in Archive of formal proofs, 2017) to formalise both primitives and prove secure multiple examples namely; the Schnorr, Chaum-Pedersen and Okamoto Σ-protocols as well as a construction that allows for compound (AND and OR) Σ-protocols and the Pedersen and Rivest commitment schemes. A highlight of the work is a formalisation of the construction of commitment schemes from Σ-protocols (Damgard in Lecture notes, 2002). We formalise this proof at an abstract level using the modularity available in Isabelle/HOL and CryptHOL. This way, the proofs of the instantiations come for free.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Automated Reasoning
Early online date9 Sep 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 9 Sep 2020

Keywords

  • Commitment schemes
  • Cryptography
  • Isabelle/HOL
  • Provable security
  • Sigma protocols

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Formalising Σ -Protocols and Commitment Schemes Using CryptHOL'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this