Abstract
Proper names of organisations are a special case of collective nouns. Their meaning can be conceptualised as a collective unit or as a plurality of persons, allowing for different morphological marking of anaphoric pronouns. This paper explores the variability of references to organisation names with 1) a corpus analysis and 2) two crowd-sourced story continuation experiments. The first shows that the preference for singular vs. plural conceptualisation is dependent on the level of formality of a text. In the second, we observe a strong preference for the plural they otherwise typical of informal speech. Using edited corpus data instead of constructed sentences as stimuli reduces this preference.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the Seventh Named Entities Workshop |
| Place of Publication | Melbourne, Australia |
| Publisher | Association for Computational Linguistics |
| Pages | 36-40 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 978-1-948087-37-7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 20 Jul 2018 |
| Event | 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics - Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre, Melbourne, Australia Duration: 15 Jul 2018 → 20 Jul 2018 http://acl2018.org/ |
Conference
| Conference | 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | ACL 2018 |
| Country/Territory | Australia |
| City | Melbourne |
| Period | 15/07/18 → 20/07/18 |
| Internet address |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Forms of Anaphoric Reference to Organisational Named Entities: Hoping to widen appeal, they diversified'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver