Foundations of representation: where might graphical symbol systems come from?

Simon Garrod, Nicolas Fay, Jon Oberlander, Tracy MacLeod

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

t has been suggested that iconic graphical signs evolve into symbolic graphical signs through repeated usage. This article reports a series of interactive graphical communication experiments using a 'pictionary' task to establish the conditions under which the evolution might occur. Experiment 1 rules out a simple repetition based account in favor of an account that requires feedback and interaction between communicators. Experiment 2 shows how the degree of interaction affects the evolution of signs according to a process of grounding. Experiment 3 confirms the prediction that those not involved directly in the interaction have trouble interpreting the graphical signs produced in Experiment 1. On the basis of these results, this article argues that icons evolve into symbols as a consequence of the systematic shift in the locus of information from the sign to the users' memory of the sign's usage supported by an interactive grounding process.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)961-987
Number of pages27
JournalCognitive Science
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Nov 2007

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Foundations of representation: where might graphical symbol systems come from?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this