Frequency and cost of human intervention at lambing: an interbreed comparison

CM Dwyer*, AB Lawrence

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

The frequency of human intervention during lambing was assessed for 708 lambs and 162 ewes in up to four deliveries. In total, 21-8 per cent of the lambs born alive required some assistance at birth and 9-4 per cent were delivered manually. Assistance was required less frequently by twin lambs and ewe lambs, and Scottish blackface lambs required assistance less frequently than Suffolk lambs. Approximately one-third of the ewes were assisted in at least one delivery and 10 per cent were assisted in all their deliveries; however, less than 20 per cent of ewes were assisted more than once. A quarter of the lambs needed some human intervention to suck successfully, and Suffolk lambs needed help more frequently. The lambs born to almost half the first-parity ewes needed help to suck, but at later deliveries the lambs born to less than a third of the ewes needed assistance. In blackface flocks the survival of 100 lambs required 4.6 hours of human intervention whereas in Suffolk flocks 28 hours were required.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-104
Number of pages4
JournalVeterinary Record
Volume157
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Jul 2005

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • NEONATAL BEHAVIOR
  • FARMING SYSTEMS
  • WELFARE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Frequency and cost of human intervention at lambing: an interbreed comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this