Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

From technology to content: The shift in dominant logic in the early American film industry

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

Abstract

The history of cultural industries is littered with successful incumbents who, failing to see or respond to dramatic shifts in their competitive landscapes, were replaced by newcomers. In essence, cultural industries showcase how one dominant logic-the means and practices for achieving desired goals (Bacharach, Bamberger, & Sonnenstuhl, 1996; Prahalad & Bettis, 1986)—is replaced by another dominant logic. For example, early technology firms, which dominated the film industry from 1895 to 1911, dismissed the importance of films containing stories and stars, only to be replaced by content firms that focused on stories and stars and attracted larger audiences (Jones, 2001). In publishing, firms shifted from a craft to business logic (Thornton, 2002), replacing CEOs and executives in doing so (Thornton & Ocasio, 1999). In the music industry, country music was ignored as a viable genre until new consumer tracking of products made explicit to decision makers its popularity with consumers (Anand & Peterson, 2000). In short, dominant players were unable to see the value of resources and alternative strate-gies that newer entrants brought into the industry and how these resources and strategies shifted the basis of competitive advantage.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Business of Culture
Subtitle of host publicationStrategic Perspectives on Entertainment and Media
EditorsJoseph Lampel, Jamal Shamsie, Theresa K. Lant
PublisherPsychology Press
Pages195-204
Number of pages10
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9781135609238, 9781410615565
ISBN (Print)9780805851052, 9780805855821
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Aug 2005

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From technology to content: The shift in dominant logic in the early American film industry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this