Abstract
Improving cancer survival rates is a UK priority and equity of access to high quality cancer irrespective of geography is a key principle. Surgery, radiation therapy and systemic therapy remain the cornerstone of the multidisciplinary management of cancer. However, costs of cancer care continue to escalate. A recent review (1) estimated the global costs of cancer care caused by death and disability as US $895 billion (excluding indirect medical costs and based on 2008 figures). Approximately 49% of patients are cured by surgery, 40% by radiotherapy alone or in combination with other treatments and 11% by systemic therapy. With > 90,000 patients per annum treated with curative intent by radiotherapy in the UK, one would anticipate that access to modern radiotherapy techniques would have a high priority. However, there are substantial differences in the NHS uptake of new anti-cancer agents and advanced radiation technologies. In this article, these differences are explored and recommendations made for addressing them.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 195-7 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | International Journal of Clinical Practice |
Volume | 67 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2013 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- Biomedical Research
- Forecasting
- Health Services Accessibility
- Humans
- Neoplasms
- Radiopharmaceuticals
- Radiosurgery
- Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
- Research Support as Topic
- State Medicine
- Technology Transfer