Futility and appropriateness: challenging words, important concepts

D Robin Taylor, Calvin J Lightbody

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

The provision of healthcare is being challenged by a 'perfect storm' of forces including an increasing population with multiple comorbidities, high expectations and resource limitations, and in the background, the pre-eminence of the 'curative medical model'. Non-beneficial (futile) treatments are wasteful and costly. They have a negative impact on quality of life especially in the last year of life. Among professionals, frequent encounters with futility cause moral distress and demoralisation. The factors that drive non-beneficial treatments include personal biases, patient-related pressures and institutional imperatives. Breaking loose from the perceived necessity to deliver non-beneficial treatment is a major challenge. Curative intent should give way toappropriatenesssuch that curative and palliative interventions are valued equally. Goals of treatment should be shaped by illness trajectory, the risk of harms as well as potential benefits and patient preferences. This strategy should be reflected in professional training and the design of acute services.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPostgraduate Medical Journal
Early online date24 Feb 2018
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 24 Feb 2018

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • Journal Article


Dive into the research topics of 'Futility and appropriateness: challenging words, important concepts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this