Gabelentz and the science of language

James McElvenny (Editor)

Research output: Book/ReportBook

Abstract / Description of output

The German sinologist and general linguist Georg von der Gabelentz (1840—1893) occupies a crucial place in linguistic scholarship around the end of the nineteenth century. As professor at the University of Leipzig and then at the University of Berlin, Gabelentz was present at the main centers of linguistics of the time. He was, however, generally critical of the narrow, technical focus of mainstream historical-comparative linguistics as practiced by the Neogrammarians and instead emphasized approaches to language inspired by a line of researchers stemming from Wilhelm von Humboldt. Gabelentz’ alternative conception of linguistics led him to several pioneering insights into language that anticipated elements of the structuralist revolution of the early twentieth century. Gabelentz and the Science of Language brings together four essays that explore Gabelentz’ contributions to linguistics from a historical perspective. In addition, it makes one of his key theoretical texts, ‘Content and Form of Speech’, available to an English-speaking audience for the first time.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherAmsterdam University Press
Number of pages316
ISBN (Print)9789462986244, 946298624X, 9789048537464
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gabelentz and the science of language'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • Content and Form of Speech

    McElvenny, J. & Ringmacher, M., 2019, Gabelentz and the Science of Language. McElvenny, J. (ed.). Amsterdam University Press, p. 131-314

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

  • The Gabelentz family in their own words

    McElvenny, J. & von Vogel, A., 2019, Gabelentz and the Science of Language. McElvenny, J. (ed.). Amsterdam University Press, p. 13-26

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Cite this