TY - JOUR
T1 - Galaxy and Mass Assembly: FUV, NUV, ugrizYJHK Petrosian, Kron and Sérsic photometry
AU - Hill, David T.
AU - Kelvin, Lee S.
AU - Driver, Simon P.
AU - Robotham, Aaron S. G.
AU - Cameron, Ewan
AU - Cross, Nicholas
AU - Andrae, Ellen
AU - Baldry, Ivan K.
AU - Bamford, Steven P.
AU - Bland-Hawthorn, Joss
AU - Brough, Sarah
AU - Conselice, Christopher J.
AU - Dye, Simon
AU - Hopkins, Andrew M.
AU - Liske, Jochen
AU - Loveday, Jon
AU - Norberg, Peder
AU - Peacock, John A.
AU - Croom, Scott M.
AU - Frenk, Carlos S.
AU - Graham, Alister W.
AU - Jones, D. Heath
AU - Kuijken, Konrad
AU - Madore, Barry F.
AU - Nichol, Robert C.
AU - Parkinson, Hannah R.
AU - Phillipps, Steven
AU - Pimbblet, Kevin A.
AU - Popescu, Cristina C.
AU - Prescott, Matthew
AU - Seibert, Mark
AU - Sharp, Rob G.
AU - Sutherland, Will J.
AU - Thomas, Daniel
AU - Tuffs, Richard J.
AU - van Kampen, Elco
PY - 2011/4/1
Y1 - 2011/4/1
N2 - In order to generate credible 0.1-2 μm spectral energy distributions,
the Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA) project requires many gigabytes of
imaging data from a number of instruments to be reprocessed into a
standard format. In this paper, we discuss the software infrastructure
we use, and create self-consistent ugrizYJHK photometry for all sources
within the GAMA sample. Using UKIDSS and SDSS archive data, we outline
the pre-processing necessary to standardize all images to a common
zero-point, the steps taken to correct for the seeing bias across the
data set and the creation of gigapixel-scale mosaics of the three 4
× 12 deg2 GAMA regions in each filter. From these
mosaics, we extract source catalogues for the GAMA regions using
elliptical Kron and Petrosian matched apertures. We also calculate
Sérsic magnitudes for all galaxies within the GAMA sample using
SIGMA, a galaxy component modelling wrapper for GALFIT 3. We compare the
resultant photometry directly and also calculate the r-band galaxy
luminosity function for all photometric data sets to highlight the
uncertainty introduced by the photometric method. We find that (1)
changing the object detection threshold has a minor effect on the
best-fitting Schechter parameters of the overall population (M*±
0.055 mag, α± 0.014, ϕ*± 0.0005 h3
Mpc-3); (2) there is an offset between data sets that use
Kron or Petrosian photometry, regardless of the filter; (3) the decision
to use circular or elliptical apertures causes an offset in M* of 0.20
mag; (4) the best-fitting Schechter parameters from total-magnitude
photometric systems (such as SDSS MODELMAG or Sérsic magnitudes)
have a steeper faint-end slope than photometric systems based upon Kron
or Petrosian measurements; and (5) our Universe’s total luminosity
density, when calculated using Kron or Petrosian r-band photometry, is
underestimated by at least 15 per cent.
AB - In order to generate credible 0.1-2 μm spectral energy distributions,
the Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA) project requires many gigabytes of
imaging data from a number of instruments to be reprocessed into a
standard format. In this paper, we discuss the software infrastructure
we use, and create self-consistent ugrizYJHK photometry for all sources
within the GAMA sample. Using UKIDSS and SDSS archive data, we outline
the pre-processing necessary to standardize all images to a common
zero-point, the steps taken to correct for the seeing bias across the
data set and the creation of gigapixel-scale mosaics of the three 4
× 12 deg2 GAMA regions in each filter. From these
mosaics, we extract source catalogues for the GAMA regions using
elliptical Kron and Petrosian matched apertures. We also calculate
Sérsic magnitudes for all galaxies within the GAMA sample using
SIGMA, a galaxy component modelling wrapper for GALFIT 3. We compare the
resultant photometry directly and also calculate the r-band galaxy
luminosity function for all photometric data sets to highlight the
uncertainty introduced by the photometric method. We find that (1)
changing the object detection threshold has a minor effect on the
best-fitting Schechter parameters of the overall population (M*±
0.055 mag, α± 0.014, ϕ*± 0.0005 h3
Mpc-3); (2) there is an offset between data sets that use
Kron or Petrosian photometry, regardless of the filter; (3) the decision
to use circular or elliptical apertures causes an offset in M* of 0.20
mag; (4) the best-fitting Schechter parameters from total-magnitude
photometric systems (such as SDSS MODELMAG or Sérsic magnitudes)
have a steeper faint-end slope than photometric systems based upon Kron
or Petrosian measurements; and (5) our Universe’s total luminosity
density, when calculated using Kron or Petrosian r-band photometry, is
underestimated by at least 15 per cent.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952721844&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17950.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17950.x
M3 - Article
SN - 1365-2966
VL - 412
SP - 765
EP - 799
JO - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
JF - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
ER -