Gender differences in the accuracy of dietary assessment methods to measure energy intake in adults: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Briar L McKenzie, Daisy H Coyle, Tracy Burrows, Emalie Rosewarne, Sanne A E Peters, Cheryl Carcel, Clare E Collins, Robyn Norton, Mark Woodward, Lindsay M Jaacks, Jacqui Webster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Diet is an important modifiable risk factor for many chronic diseases. Measurement of dietary intake usually relies on self-report, subject to multiple biases. There is a need to understand gender differences in the self-report of dietary intake and the implications of any differences in targeting nutrition interventions. Literature in this area is limited and it is currently unknown whether self-report dietary assessment methods are equally accurate for women and men. The aim of this systematic review is to determine whether there are differences by gender in reporting energy intake compared with a reference measure of total energy expenditure.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A comprehensive search of published original research studies will be performed in MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane library. Original research studies will be included if they were conducted in free-living/unhospitalised adults and included a measure for both women and men of (a) self-reported energy intake and (b) total energy expenditure by doubly labelled water. One author will conduct the electronic database searches, two authors will independently screen studies, conduct a quality appraisal of the included studies using standardised tools and extract data. If further information is needed, then study authors will be contacted. If appropriate, a random-effects meta-analysis will be conducted, with inverse probability weighting, to quantify differences in the mean difference in agreement between reported energy intake and measured energy expenditure between women and men, by self-report assessment method. Subgroup analyses will be conducted by participant factors, geographical factors and study quality.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All data used will be from published primary research studies or deidentified results provided at the discretion of any study authors that we contact. We will submit our findings to a peer-reviewed scientific journal and will disseminate results through presentations at international scientific conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019131715.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e035611
JournalBMJ Open
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2020

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Gender differences in the accuracy of dietary assessment methods to measure energy intake in adults: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this