Genome evolution in three species of cactophilic drosophila

Alejandro Sanchez-Flores, Fernando Peñaloza, Javier Carpinteyro-Ponce, Nestor Nazario-Yepiz, Cei Abreu-Goodger, Carlos A. Machado, Therese Ann Markow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We report genomes of two species of cactophilic Drosophila: Drosophila arizonae and D.navojoa. These two are the closest relatives of D. mojavensis, forming the D. mojavensis cluster. D. mojavensis and D. arizonae diverged from D. navojoa 5.8 Mya, while the split between D. arizonae and D. mojavensis is more recent, at 1.5 Mya. Together the three genomes provide opportunities to examine genomic changes associated with speciation and host shifts in this ecologically defined group of flies. The three species are also separated by fixed inversion differences in three of their six chromosomes. While the levels of nucleotide divergence in the colinear chromosomes are significantly lower than in the inverted chromosomes, consistent with a past role of the inversions in preventing gene flow, the patterns differ among the inverted chromosomes when the locations of nucleotides inside or outside of the inversions are considered. For Muller element E, there is greater divergence external to the inversion breakpoints. For Muller A, the divergence is slightly higher inside the inversions, while for Muller B, the breakpoints and hence the difference in substitutions in relation to the inversions could not be determined. The differences among the inverted chromosomes, especially once the breakpoints are clearly established, could aid in dating the origins of the inversions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3097-3105
Number of pages9
JournalG3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
Volume6
Early online date3 Aug 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2016

Keywords

  • drosophila
  • evolution
  • genome
  • inversions
  • cactophilic

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Genome evolution in three species of cactophilic drosophila'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this