TY - JOUR
T1 - Getting pastoral systems productivity right
AU - Martha Jr, Geraldo B.
AU - Gustavo Barioni, Luis
AU - Santos, Patrícia M.
AU - Maule, Rodrigo Fernando
AU - Moran, Dominic
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge the support of Fapesp 's Project “Integração cana-de-açúcar/pecuária: modelagem e otimização” (Fapesp, 2017/11523-5 ), and “Projeto Rural Sustentável – Cerrado” (IDB Technical Cooperation #BR-T1409). DM wishes to acknowledge UKRI funding under grant numbers BB/W018152/1 , BB/T004436/1 , and PMS acknowledges the support from CNPq ( 311287/2020-4 ).
Funding Information:
We acknowledge the support of Fapesp's Project “Integração cana-de-açúcar/pecuária: modelagem e otimização” (Fapesp, 2017/11523-5), and “Projeto Rural Sustentável – Cerrado” (IDB Technical Cooperation #BR-T1409). DM wishes to acknowledge UKRI funding under grant numbers BB/W018152/1, BB/T004436/1, and PMS acknowledges the support from CNPq (311287/2020-4).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024
PY - 2024/3/15
Y1 - 2024/3/15
N2 - Beef production in pasture-based systems is increasingly contested due to related biophysical and environmental challenges. Addressing these requires rigorous science-based evidence to inform private decisions and public policies. Increasing yields and simultaneously reducing the negative environmental impacts of agricultural and livestock production are central to sustainable intensification approaches. Yet, stocking rate, the commonly used metric for animal productivity in pastures, or more broadly, of sustainable intensification in pastoral production systems, warrants scrutiny to signpost successful transformative change of food systems and to avoid provision of misleading policy advice. Here we discuss why future studies would benefit of considering the two constituent elements of productivity in pastoral systems – animal performance (kg of animal product/head) and stocking rates (heads/hectare) –, rather than stocking rates alone
AB - Beef production in pasture-based systems is increasingly contested due to related biophysical and environmental challenges. Addressing these requires rigorous science-based evidence to inform private decisions and public policies. Increasing yields and simultaneously reducing the negative environmental impacts of agricultural and livestock production are central to sustainable intensification approaches. Yet, stocking rate, the commonly used metric for animal productivity in pastures, or more broadly, of sustainable intensification in pastoral production systems, warrants scrutiny to signpost successful transformative change of food systems and to avoid provision of misleading policy advice. Here we discuss why future studies would benefit of considering the two constituent elements of productivity in pastoral systems – animal performance (kg of animal product/head) and stocking rates (heads/hectare) –, rather than stocking rates alone
KW - Agricultural policies
KW - Bio-economic modeling
KW - Decision-making
KW - Sustainable intensification
KW - Yield gap
U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170268
DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170268
M3 - Comment/debate
SN - 0048-9697
VL - 916
SP - 1
EP - 4
JO - Science of the Total Environment
JF - Science of the Total Environment
M1 - 170268
ER -