Global Health Security and Universal Health Coverage: from a Marriage of Convenience to a Strategic, Effective Partnership

Clare Wenham, Rebecca Katz, Charles Birungi, Lisa Boden, Mark Eccleston Turner, Lawrence O. Goston, Renzo Guinto , Mark Hellowell, Kristine Husoy Ornarheim, Joshua Hutton , Anuj Kapilashrami, Emily Mendenhall, Alexandra Phelan, Marlee Tichenor, Devi Sridhar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Global Health Security and Universal Health Coverage have been frequently considered as “two sides of the same coin”. Yet, greater analysis is required as to whether and where these two ideals converge and what important differences exist. A consequence of ignoring their individual characteristics is to distort global and local health priorities in an effort to streamline policymaking and funding activities. This paper examines the areas of convergence and divergence between global health security and universal health coverage, both conceptually and empirically. We consider analytical concepts of risk and human rights as fundamental to both goals, but also identify differences in priorities between the two ideals. We support the argument that the process of Health System Strengthening provides the most promising mechanism of benefiting both goals.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBMJ Global Health
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Jan 2019

Keywords

  • Universal health coverage
  • Global health security
  • Health systems
  • Strengthening
  • Risk
  • Human rights

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Global Health Security and Universal Health Coverage: from a Marriage of Convenience to a Strategic, Effective Partnership'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this