Global prescriptions and neglect of the ‘local’: What lessons for global health governance has the Framework Convention on Global Health learnt?

Anuj Kapilashrami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The Framework Convention on Global Health comes amid wider recognition of health inequalities and several recent calls for greater democratisation of the world order. The framework suggests wider consensus on principles of human rights, equity and justice in addressing global health. In this paper we draw on our empirical research and wider literature to discuss the lessons learnt from application of global ‘ideas’ and ‘innovations’ and reveal institutional and political processes and structural constraints that affect their roll-out. We present our concerns with the approach on the basis of two key arguments. First, gross inequalities and unequal distributional effects of the current global political and economic environment do not offer a level playing field for nation states to translate principles enshrined in the framework into practice. Second, such a ‘view from above’ undermines processes of empowering communities for responsive health systems. Through a case vignette of the People’s Health Movement we then discuss substantive ways to facilitate local ideas and action.
Original languageEnglish
JournalGlobal Health Governance
Publication statusPublished - 21 Jan 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Global prescriptions and neglect of the ‘local’: What lessons for global health governance has the Framework Convention on Global Health learnt?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this