Going critical: Writing about recordings

Simon Frith

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract / Description of output

Introduction: Criticism and commerce
The talking machine, as is well-known, found its first sponsor in the cycle trade – the music trade would have none of it.
Phono Trader and Recorder, 1911
For about twenty years, between 1972 and 1992, I practised as a rock critic. While this did mean reviewing concerts and sometimes talking to performers, to be a rock critic was to be a record critic. My first published work was a record review in Rolling Stone, and rock, as a new kind of musical institution, was centred on the record. The founding fathers of rock criticism, Greil Marcus and Jon Landau, both edited Rolling Stone's record review pages, while Robert Christgau, the self-titled Dean of Rock Criticism, started his Consumer Guide, capsule reviews of every rock record released, in 1969.
Towards the end of my time as a critic I began to notice articles about the decline of rock criticism. ‘Where have all the rock critics gone?’ asked Ed Ward, editor of the Rolling Stone history of rock ‘n’ roll, in August 1988, following up his question later that year with the more assertive ‘Rock Critics RIP!’ This was to become a recurring feature-story line. In 1998 Gina Arnold, a leading voice in the next generation of American rock critics, reflected in her turn ‘On the death of rock criticism’ (‘Once it was about passion. Now it's all puff’) in the online Flagpole Magazine, while veteran Italian rock critic, Gino Castaldo, deplored the ‘strong decrease in the demand for critics’.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Cambridge Companion to Recorded Music
EditorsNicholas Cook, Eric Clarke, Daniel Leech-Wilkinson, John Rink
PublisherCambridge University Press
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781139002684
ISBN (Print)9780521865821, 9780521684613
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2009


Dive into the research topics of 'Going critical: Writing about recordings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this