Graham Harman, immaterialism: Objects and social theory

Norah Campbell*, Stephen Dunne, Paul Ennis

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

The philosopher Graham Harman argues that contemporary debates about the nature of reality as such, and about the nature of objects in particular, can be meaningfully applied to social theory and practice. With Immaterialism, he has recently provided a case-based demonstration of how this could happen. But social theorists have compelling reasons to oppose object-oriented social theory’s 15 principles. Fidelity to Harman’s aesthetic foundationalism, and his particular use of serial endosymbiosis theory as a mechanism of social change, constrain the very practices which it is supposed to enable. However, social theory stands to benefit from object-oriented philosophy through what we call posthuman relationism – characterised as a commitment to the reality of the nonhuman, but not divorced from the human. The emphasis in object-oriented social theory on how objects withdraw from cognitive or affective capture and representation needs to be tempered by an equal focus on how objects appeal.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121-137
Number of pages17
JournalTheory, Culture and Society
Volume36
Issue number3
Early online date13 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2019

Keywords

  • Graham Harman
  • object-oriented social theory
  • posthuman relationism
  • symbiosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Graham Harman, immaterialism: Objects and social theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this