Abstract / Description of output
BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is a serious allergic or hypersensitivity reaction, which is rapid in onset and sometimes can prove fatal. Although H2-antihistamines are often administered for emergency treatment in anaphylaxis, there is uncertainty about their effectiveness in this disease.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the benefits and harms of H2-antihistamines in the treatment of anaphylaxis.
METHODS: A systematic review was performed of randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing H2-antihistamines with placebo or no intervention in patients with anaphylaxis.
RESULTS: The authors failed to identify any eligible studies for inclusion in this systematic review.
CONCLUSION: When H2-antihistamines are recommended for anaphylaxis treatment, the status of the evidence base supporting their use should be described. Well-designed randomized controlled trials investigating the role of H2-antihistamines in anaphylaxis treatment are urgently needed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 126-131 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology |
Volume | 112 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Feb 2014 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- Anaphylaxis
- Anti-Allergic Agents
- Epinephrine
- Evidence-Based Medicine
- Histamine H1 Antagonists
- Histamine H2 Antagonists
- Humans
- Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Shock