Happy diamond anniversary JMS! A decade analysis of the Journal of Management Studies

Sorin M. S. Krammer*, Peter Dahlin, Jonathan P. Doh, Kristina Potočnik

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

The Journal of Management Studies, founded in 1963, is celebrating its 60 th year. Clark et al. (2014) conducted a bibliometric analysis for its 50 th anniversary assessing whether the journal had maintained its leading international ranking and sustained its mission to serve as a broad-based management outlet. In this review, we build on and extend their findings by examining trends in the journal over the past decade (2012–22). We present a broader analysis of JMS by exploring its unique identity within the management journal ecosystem and examining its scope and breadth in terms of topics, methods, and author demographics to document JMS's evolution, impact, reach, and accessibility. We develop a new bibliometric framework that employs a mix of qualitative and quantitative analyses (including regression, text, and language analysis) to cover a broad range of considerations for a journal and its stakeholders. In so doing, we contribute to the bibliometric and review research areas by proposing new metrics (related to diversity, equity, and inclusion) and analysis tools to assess the relative position of an academic journal. Employing this framework, we conclude that JMS has retained and enhanced its position as a leading, cutting-edge general management journal.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1654-1682
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of Management Studies
Volume61
Issue number4
Early online date24 Jan 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2024

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • bibliometric analysis
  • business and management
  • gender
  • diversity
  • academic publishing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Happy diamond anniversary JMS! A decade analysis of the Journal of Management Studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this