TY - JOUR
T1 - Have we been here before? Reviewing evidence of energy technology phase-out to inform home heating transitions
AU - Kerr, Niall
AU - Winskel, Mark
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank members of the project advisory group for their contributions throughout the process of evidence review and peer-review. We also acknowledge the advice and suggestions of members of relevant policy teams at the Scottish Government, and the advice of two anonymous ERSS reviewers on an earlier version of the paper. This research is supported by the Postdoctoral Research Fellowship (Energy and Climate Policy Effectiveness in Scotland) funded by ClimateXChange and the Scottish Government . The grant number for this project is RESAS PROJ/10447 . Finally we would like to thank the journal editor and the anonymous reviewers for their thorough and very helpful reviews and comments.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - The rapid phase-out of fossil fuel home heating technologies is a formidable policy challenge. In such situations, referring to other cases of technology phase-out that are in some ways similar can offer useful insights, and a reassuring sense that ‘we have been here before’. However, analogous reasoning of this kind tends to be partial and anecdotal, so it can mislead rather than inform. Here, we seek to draw more fully on analogous evidence to inform fossil fuel technology phase-out in the home heating sector, with particular reference to the UK. We review international energy technology phase-out experiences across three different sectors, five different technology types and twenty countries. We then assemble the evidence into an interpretive framework in which energy technology phase-out is seen as an outcome of distinctive but interacting techno-economic and socio-institutional factors and policy design issues, including: relative cost and performance, infrastructure and system context, public engagement and acceptability, incumbent interests and policy mixes and rationales. While some of these feature prominently in policy debates and transitions research, others command less attention. Providing a fuller representation of the factors involved in energy technology phase-out encourages more robust analogous reasoning in policy and research, recognising differences as well as similarities and the extent to which we have been here before.
AB - The rapid phase-out of fossil fuel home heating technologies is a formidable policy challenge. In such situations, referring to other cases of technology phase-out that are in some ways similar can offer useful insights, and a reassuring sense that ‘we have been here before’. However, analogous reasoning of this kind tends to be partial and anecdotal, so it can mislead rather than inform. Here, we seek to draw more fully on analogous evidence to inform fossil fuel technology phase-out in the home heating sector, with particular reference to the UK. We review international energy technology phase-out experiences across three different sectors, five different technology types and twenty countries. We then assemble the evidence into an interpretive framework in which energy technology phase-out is seen as an outcome of distinctive but interacting techno-economic and socio-institutional factors and policy design issues, including: relative cost and performance, infrastructure and system context, public engagement and acceptability, incumbent interests and policy mixes and rationales. While some of these feature prominently in policy debates and transitions research, others command less attention. Providing a fuller representation of the factors involved in energy technology phase-out encourages more robust analogous reasoning in policy and research, recognising differences as well as similarities and the extent to which we have been here before.
KW - analogous reasoning
KW - energy technology phase-out
KW - energy transition
KW - heat decarbonisation
KW - policy analogues
KW - policy transfer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131928129&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102640
DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102640
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85131928129
VL - 89
JO - Energy Research & Social Science
JF - Energy Research & Social Science
SN - 2214-6296
M1 - 102640
ER -