Projects per year
Abstract / Description of output
The barriers that prevent or delay female victims of sexual assault from disclosing to criminal justice authorities, and the obstacles that often disincline professional and lay decision-makers from finding such narratives credible, have been well documented. This article explores the extent to which such difficulties may be replicated, and compounded, in the case of female asylum-seekers; it will examine the complex ways in which the structure and processes, as well as the heavily politicised context, of asylum decision-making may contribute towards a silencing of sexual assault narratives. The article will explore the ways in which the intersection of race, ethnicity, gender, culture, religion, language and nationality present distinct challenges to women asylum applicants for whom an alleged rape is a part of their claim, and reflect on some of the difficulties this presents in terms of assessing the credibility of sexual assault allegations, and of the overall asylum claim.
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
FingerprintDive into the research topics of '‘Hearing the Right Gaps’: Enabling and Responding to Disclosures of Sexual Violence within the UK Asylum Process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- 1 Finished
Rape narratives and credibility Assessment (of Female Claimants) at the Asylum and Immigration Tribual
1/07/09 → 31/03/12
Baillot, H., Cowan, S. & Munro, V. E., Mar 2014, In: International Journal of Law in Context. 10, 1, p. 105-139
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
'Hearing the Right Gaps': Enabling and Responding to Disclosures of Sexual Violence within the UK Asylum ProcessCowan, S., Baillot, H. & Munro, V., 2013, University of Edinburgh, School of Law, Working Papers, 25 p.
Research output: Working paperOpen AccessFile