Heterogeneous agendas around public engagement in stem cell research: The case for maintaining plasticity

Sarah Parry, Wendy Faulkner, Sarah Cunningham-Burley, Nicola J. Marks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Although public engagement is now part of the business of doing science, there is considerable divergence about what the term means and what public engagement ought to be doing. This paper reflects on these heterogeneous meanings and agendas through an analysis of focus group data from research on public engagement in stem cell research. Three broad visions of public engagement are identified: as education and information provision; as dialogue; and as participation in policy making. In analysing the implications of these visions three dimensions are highlighted: weakly and strongly structured visions of public engagement; the co production of roles and relationships; and the framing of what is at stake. Each of these has the potential to include or exclude some groups in public engagement. We conclude that social scientists should seek to maintain the plasticity of public engagement as a necessary condition for greater participation and reflexivity in science policy, practice and governance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-80
Number of pages20
JournalScience & Technology Studies
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012

Keywords

  • public engagement
  • reflexivity
  • role of social scientists

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Heterogeneous agendas around public engagement in stem cell research: The case for maintaining plasticity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this