How do conductors' movements communicate compositional features and interpretational intentions?

Yu-fen Huang, Simon Coleman, Eric Barnhill, Raymond MacDonald, Nicola Moran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Conductors use body movements to communicate their interpretations of musical works though performance directions regarding selected musical features. The aim of this study was to examine how the kinematic features of conducting movements relate to compositional elements such as rhythmic patterns, melodic peaks, dynamic changes, and also how they relate to conductors’ own interpretational comments. Six conductors with conducting experience of between 4 and 29 years were interviewed and asked to annotate a musical score (Eine Kleine Nachtmusik by W. A. Mozart, No. 13, K. 525, first movement, mm. 1–55) according to a number of interpretational intentions. They then performed the same piece of music with a string quintet, while their upper body movements were recorded using a 9-camera Qualisys motion capture system. Kinematic parameters including baton speed, acceleration, and jerk were extracted via Visual 3D and Matlab software packages. Cross correlation confirmed that, as expected, within conductor baton movement kinematic patterns were more similar than between-conductor patterns. A novel analysis method (Deviation Point Analysis) was developed, which revealed particular time-points in the score with distinctive baton movement features, including movement kinematic deviations and high movement variability between conductors, which related to specific melodic, rhythmic, and dynamic
structures and interpretational intentions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)148-157
Number of pages10
JournalPsychomusicology: Music, Mind and Brain
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2017

Keywords

  • conducting movement
  • kinematics
  • musical structure
  • interpretation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How do conductors' movements communicate compositional features and interpretational intentions?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this