TY - CHAP
T1 - How multiethnic is a multiethnolect?
T2 - The recontextualisation of Multicultural London English
AU - Ilbury, Christian
AU - Kerswill, Paul
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Clyne (2000) coined the term multiethnolect to refer to a newly-formed contact variety of a mainstream, majority-community language in contexts of high immigration. This chapter poses the question of just how ‘multiethnic’ such a language variety may be in practice, focusing on Multicultural London English (MLE), a multiethnolect spoken by young, working-class people in inner-city areas of London (Cheshire et al., 2008; 2011). Earlier research demonstrated that neighbourhood, ethnicity and the ethnic diversity of an individual's social network predicted the use of MLE. More recently, scholars working in a variety of contexts have documented a number of differences in the use, function and distribution of MLE features (Drummond, 2018; Gates, 2018; Ilbury, 2019). In this chapter, we consider the ‘recontextualisation’ (Bauman and Briggs, 1990) of MLE. We first discuss its status as a speech style that is associated with particular social practices, such as participation in the grime music scene. We then reflect on the association of MLE with a contemporary Black British identity. Finally, we consider the ways in which MLE features have acquired a type of ‘cultural capital’ that speakers use to index their belonging to certain (youth) subcultures (Cutler and Røyneland, 2015).
AB - Clyne (2000) coined the term multiethnolect to refer to a newly-formed contact variety of a mainstream, majority-community language in contexts of high immigration. This chapter poses the question of just how ‘multiethnic’ such a language variety may be in practice, focusing on Multicultural London English (MLE), a multiethnolect spoken by young, working-class people in inner-city areas of London (Cheshire et al., 2008; 2011). Earlier research demonstrated that neighbourhood, ethnicity and the ethnic diversity of an individual's social network predicted the use of MLE. More recently, scholars working in a variety of contexts have documented a number of differences in the use, function and distribution of MLE features (Drummond, 2018; Gates, 2018; Ilbury, 2019). In this chapter, we consider the ‘recontextualisation’ (Bauman and Briggs, 1990) of MLE. We first discuss its status as a speech style that is associated with particular social practices, such as participation in the grime music scene. We then reflect on the association of MLE with a contemporary Black British identity. Finally, we consider the ways in which MLE features have acquired a type of ‘cultural capital’ that speakers use to index their belonging to certain (youth) subcultures (Cutler and Røyneland, 2015).
U2 - 10.4324/9781003166849-34
DO - 10.4324/9781003166849-34
M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)
AN - SCOPUS:85181795272
SN - 9780367764166
T3 - Routledge Handbooks in Applied Linguistics
SP - 362
EP - 376
BT - The Routledge Handbook of Language and Youth Culture
A2 - Svendsen, Bente A.
A2 - Jonsson, Rickard
PB - Routledge
CY - London
ER -