How to conceptualise energy law and policy for an interdisciplinary audience: The case of post-Brexit UK

Paul Cairney, Aileen McHarg, Nicola McEwen, Karen Turner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Interdisciplinary energy research is essential. It advances our understanding of potential transitions from high to low carbon energy systems. However, it is easier to propose than deliver. It requires translation into a simpler language, to aid communication, but not at the expense of the conceptual language that drives our understanding of complex energy systems. We combine legal, political science, and policy studies to show how to balance the need to communicate accessibly and recognise legal and policymaking complexity. We begin with a statement so accepted in legal studies that it has become a truism: the law in the books is not the same as the law in action. The allocation of legal competences is only one influence on policymaking in a complex system. We describe three key ways to conceptualise this relationship between law, policy, and energy systems, focusing on the: (1) ‘on paper’ legal separation of powers between different governments, (2) interaction between law and policy in practice, including blurry boundaries between formal responsibility and informal influence, and (3) role of law as one of many contributors to policymaking. We use these approaches to explain the implications of Brexit for UK energy policy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)459-466
Number of pages8
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume129
Early online date22 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 22 Feb 2019

Keywords

  • Energy law and policy
  • Multi-level policymaking
  • Energy systems
  • Complex systems
  • UK
  • Scotland
  • brexit

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How to conceptualise energy law and policy for an interdisciplinary audience: The case of post-Brexit UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this